Order:
  1.  29
    Determinants of contraceptive use among women of reproductive age in Great Britain and Germany I: demographic factors.B. J. Oddens & P. Lehert - 1997 - Journal of Biosocial Science 29 (4):415-435.
    Multifactorial analyses of data from representative British and German national contraception surveys were used to examine the principal demographic determinants of contraceptive use by women. Contraceptive use appeared to be determined mainly by reference to ‘reproductive status’. Women who were postponing pregnancies were using oral contraceptives, whereas those who wanted no more children relied more on intrauterine devices or sterilisation. Differences between the countries suggested that the choice of contraceptive method was influenced by health care policy, the organisation of the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2.  12
    Determinants of contraceptive use among women of reproductive age in Great Britain and Germany II: psychological factors.B. J. Oddens - 1997 - Journal of Biosocial Science 29 (4):437-470.
    Psychological determinants of contraceptive use were investigated in Great Britain and Germany, using national data obtained in 1992. It was hypothesised that current contraceptive use among sexually active, fertile women aged 15-45 was related to their attitude towards the various contraceptive methods, social influences, perceptions of being able to use a method correctly and consistently, a correct estimation of fertility, and communication with their partner. Effects of age and country were also taken into account.The attitude of respondents towards the various (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Residential assimilation and residential attainment: examining the effects of ethnicity and immigration.Michael J. White, Sharon Sassler, S. Kirchengast, E. M. Winkler, D. L. Blackwell, Y. Weiss, R. J. Willis, B. J. Oddens, P. Lehert & F. Kalter - 1996 - Journal of Biosocial Science 28 (2):193-210.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark